Gotta love that she complains about your use of talking points and lack of evidence, while responding with only talking points and lack of evidence.
Just last night I stumbled across a screen shot of a series of tweets I had found when I was still on Facebook. A few years ago, when the mantra "trans women are women" began to be posted and…
Gotta love that she complains about your use of talking points and lack of evidence, while responding with only talking points and lack of evidence.
Just last night I stumbled across a screen shot of a series of tweets I had found when I was still on Facebook. A few years ago, when the mantra "trans women are women" began to be posted and tweeted in huge numbers overnight, and people were still new to the concept and unafraid to ask questions about it, and even disagree, there began this online argument: people who didn't believe the mantra would make points about objective reality and truth. The phrase "2+2=4" was a very popular example of this objective reality.
The preachers of the mantra went into overdrive trying to come up with examples that prove that 2+2 doesn't always equal 4. It was astonishing, how people were twisting themselves into nonsensical positions to invent these examples.
I had forgotten all about that chapter in the insane cultural phenomenon until I found that screen shot last night.
"people who didn't believe the mantra would make points about objective reality and truth. The phrase "2+2=4" was a very popular example of this objective reality."
Haha! I remember this! I mentioned it in an article a few years back. And yes, I'm having a fascinating conversation about objective reality at the moment. It'll make an appearance here at some point. It's been a real lightbulb moment for me.
Gotta love that she complains about your use of talking points and lack of evidence, while responding with only talking points and lack of evidence.
Just last night I stumbled across a screen shot of a series of tweets I had found when I was still on Facebook. A few years ago, when the mantra "trans women are women" began to be posted and tweeted in huge numbers overnight, and people were still new to the concept and unafraid to ask questions about it, and even disagree, there began this online argument: people who didn't believe the mantra would make points about objective reality and truth. The phrase "2+2=4" was a very popular example of this objective reality.
The preachers of the mantra went into overdrive trying to come up with examples that prove that 2+2 doesn't always equal 4. It was astonishing, how people were twisting themselves into nonsensical positions to invent these examples.
I had forgotten all about that chapter in the insane cultural phenomenon until I found that screen shot last night.
"people who didn't believe the mantra would make points about objective reality and truth. The phrase "2+2=4" was a very popular example of this objective reality."
Haha! I remember this! I mentioned it in an article a few years back. And yes, I'm having a fascinating conversation about objective reality at the moment. It'll make an appearance here at some point. It's been a real lightbulb moment for me.