“ On some things you seem to agree, on some you feel I'm not on point, on some Steve thinks I'm weird.”
😅Like a belligerent goldfish. I was having a quiet bet with myself about how long it would be before you claimed I called you weird again, even though I’ve clarified that three, or I guess four times now. But even I thought you’d do be…
“ On some things you seem to agree, on some you feel I'm not on point, on some Steve thinks I'm weird.”
😅Like a belligerent goldfish. I was having a quiet bet with myself about how long it would be before you claimed I called you weird again, even though I’ve clarified that three, or I guess four times now. But even I thought you’d do better r than the same article, twenty-four hours later. You really are hopeless. I’ll stop wasting my time.
The sentence begins “some things”. I state three ways you interpret my “things”:
A. I’m on point
B. I’m not on point.
C. I’m weird
It’s all about my “things, not about me.
Maybe I just don’t understand the basic structure of the English language.
Regardless, you’re beating a dead horse. Hope my restructuring of the sentence helps you understand my intended goal with the sentence.
As I said, for me, writing and responding are casual for enrichment and distraction. Not my profession. For many years I was in technology. Now I run a bakery business.
I’m more interested in what “the question” was for your article.
I’m also interested in what question you’re asking us as readers to comment on.
“Maybe I just don’t understand the basic structure of the English language.”
This much is clear. I don’t care what you do for a living or why you write, all I’m asking is that you don’t lie about/misrepresent the things I say.
I didn’t call you anything. You have no idea what I think (projection, remember?), I have clarified several times that I didn’t call YOU weird, I called your comment weird, which I stand by. So every time you repeat the claim that I called you weird or even the “projection” that I think you’re weird you are consciously lying about me.
I would like you to stop doing that. In fact, I’d appreciate it if you stopped discussing me altogether and stuck to discussing the article.
“ On some things you seem to agree, on some you feel I'm not on point, on some Steve thinks I'm weird.”
😅Like a belligerent goldfish. I was having a quiet bet with myself about how long it would be before you claimed I called you weird again, even though I’ve clarified that three, or I guess four times now. But even I thought you’d do better r than the same article, twenty-four hours later. You really are hopeless. I’ll stop wasting my time.
Steve, Steve, Steve….
The sentence begins “some things”. I state three ways you interpret my “things”:
A. I’m on point
B. I’m not on point.
C. I’m weird
It’s all about my “things, not about me.
Maybe I just don’t understand the basic structure of the English language.
Regardless, you’re beating a dead horse. Hope my restructuring of the sentence helps you understand my intended goal with the sentence.
As I said, for me, writing and responding are casual for enrichment and distraction. Not my profession. For many years I was in technology. Now I run a bakery business.
I’m more interested in what “the question” was for your article.
I’m also interested in what question you’re asking us as readers to comment on.
“Maybe I just don’t understand the basic structure of the English language.”
This much is clear. I don’t care what you do for a living or why you write, all I’m asking is that you don’t lie about/misrepresent the things I say.
I didn’t call you anything. You have no idea what I think (projection, remember?), I have clarified several times that I didn’t call YOU weird, I called your comment weird, which I stand by. So every time you repeat the claim that I called you weird or even the “projection” that I think you’re weird you are consciously lying about me.
I would like you to stop doing that. In fact, I’d appreciate it if you stopped discussing me altogether and stuck to discussing the article.