Neither I, nor anybody else, can learn from someone who is “not here to persuade, but to “shame.”
All you’ve been doing here is indulging your ego. It’s painfully obvious that nothing you’re saying, and certainly not the way you’re saying it, will persuade or edify anybody. Nor is it meant to. It’s just you flattering yourself for an imagined audience.
Again, disagreement is welcome here, and if you feel you have something valuable to share (like that research on single use spaces), I’m sure many people would be glad to hear it.
But if all you want to do is grandstand and abuse people and make silly little threats about “the hard way” (believe me when I say you don’t even begin to intimidate me), then yes, you’ll have to do it elsewhere.
You know, you’re not the first person to say I’m funny. Glad you’re enjoying yourself.
I’m asking you for the third time for that research, I’d really like to learn. Otherwise, yeah, please share my work with larger accounts. Make sure thousands of new people see my work. What a terrifying threat that is for a content creator…😅
While I’m waiting for sagepub to stop being a pita, are you ever going to actually address your dismissal of your own pontification-related comment, Steve?
You and Steve need to take it outside. I agree with you substantively, Digital Canary. Read what I have written. But there is not point in you and Steve going at it like ping pong.
However, Steve keeps providing excellent fodder to support my thesis that he’s a self-important and (at least subconsciously) misogynistic blowhard.
I promise I won’t further antagonize him here unless he makes yet another feeble attempt to deflect from his obvious shortcomings. In such an event, I can’t promise I won’t fall to the temptation of goading him into further displays of his “brilliance”.
But again, I get where you’re coming from. And appreciate the supportive words.
Have at it man.
Your hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness is already being picked up by bigger accounts, and I’ve not even started to go to work on you both.
Feel free to walk back your respective claims of superior understanding anytime, and listen to what’s been said.
Or dig deeper.
The choice is yours: I’d prefer you learn something the easy way, but I’m fully prepared to get it through to you the hard way.
Neither I, nor anybody else, can learn from someone who is “not here to persuade, but to “shame.”
All you’ve been doing here is indulging your ego. It’s painfully obvious that nothing you’re saying, and certainly not the way you’re saying it, will persuade or edify anybody. Nor is it meant to. It’s just you flattering yourself for an imagined audience.
Again, disagreement is welcome here, and if you feel you have something valuable to share (like that research on single use spaces), I’m sure many people would be glad to hear it.
But if all you want to do is grandstand and abuse people and make silly little threats about “the hard way” (believe me when I say you don’t even begin to intimidate me), then yes, you’ll have to do it elsewhere.
Still pontificating, Steve. You’re a laugh riot.
You know, you’re not the first person to say I’m funny. Glad you’re enjoying yourself.
I’m asking you for the third time for that research, I’d really like to learn. Otherwise, yeah, please share my work with larger accounts. Make sure thousands of new people see my work. What a terrifying threat that is for a content creator…😅
Been reading your comments lately, Steve?
Seems like folks here are enthralled by your brilliance.
FWIW i did come here to persuade.
And after you tripled down (unpersuadable🤷♂️) I switched to shaming.
So about your pontificating?
Any thoughts from your brilliant mind?
While I’m waiting for sagepub to stop being a pita, are you ever going to actually address your dismissal of your own pontification-related comment, Steve?
You and Steve need to take it outside. I agree with you substantively, Digital Canary. Read what I have written. But there is not point in you and Steve going at it like ping pong.
I understand, Holly, and I will be.
However, Steve keeps providing excellent fodder to support my thesis that he’s a self-important and (at least subconsciously) misogynistic blowhard.
I promise I won’t further antagonize him here unless he makes yet another feeble attempt to deflect from his obvious shortcomings. In such an event, I can’t promise I won’t fall to the temptation of goading him into further displays of his “brilliance”.
But again, I get where you’re coming from. And appreciate the supportive words.