"Maybe read what Doc Stock @kathleenstock — a professional philosopher — has to say about your pipe dream"
😅 Jesus. What is wrong with you?! It's not "my pipe dream." I'm saying now for the third time I don't think it'll happen. But yes, obviously a world where women aren't endangered by men would be a good thing. Aspiring to this point,…
"Maybe read what Doc Stock @kathleenstock — a professional philosopher — has to say about your pipe dream"
😅 Jesus. What is wrong with you?! It's not "my pipe dream." I'm saying now for the third time I don't think it'll happen. But yes, obviously a world where women aren't endangered by men would be a good thing. Aspiring to this point, even if it's never going to be fully realised, is obviously worthwhile. We've already taken significant strides in this direction in the past 50 years, say.
But yes, until that glorious day, I'm advocating unequivocally for the maintenance of female-only spaces. You're in the comments of an article I've written stating exactly that. So what's got you in quite such a state I'm not sure.
Anyway man, it appears to be futile trying to talk to you. Enjoy virtue signalling for your imagined audience, I guess. I'm sure all your posturing and insulting random people will be invaluable in the fight for women's equality.
Steve, you’re not “brilliant”, you’re just a defensive man who has a way with words sometimes.
Once for for the hard of self-reflecting: you are the one who wrote that “once we get to a point where women don’t have to fear men behaving inappropriately/violently, the questions of women’s spaces will be moot.”
And you are the one who had doubled, tripled, quadrupled down on being in the right.
"Maybe read what Doc Stock @kathleenstock — a professional philosopher — has to say about your pipe dream"
😅 Jesus. What is wrong with you?! It's not "my pipe dream." I'm saying now for the third time I don't think it'll happen. But yes, obviously a world where women aren't endangered by men would be a good thing. Aspiring to this point, even if it's never going to be fully realised, is obviously worthwhile. We've already taken significant strides in this direction in the past 50 years, say.
But yes, until that glorious day, I'm advocating unequivocally for the maintenance of female-only spaces. You're in the comments of an article I've written stating exactly that. So what's got you in quite such a state I'm not sure.
Anyway man, it appears to be futile trying to talk to you. Enjoy virtue signalling for your imagined audience, I guess. I'm sure all your posturing and insulting random people will be invaluable in the fight for women's equality.
I totally love Kathleen Stock!
Still not willing to reflect.
Steve, you’re not “brilliant”, you’re just a defensive man who has a way with words sometimes.
Once for for the hard of self-reflecting: you are the one who wrote that “once we get to a point where women don’t have to fear men behaving inappropriately/violently, the questions of women’s spaces will be moot.”
And you are the one who had doubled, tripled, quadrupled down on being in the right.
You’re not.
So now I go loud … and we all get to mock you.
I feel like some people just invoke ‘women’ to lecture and speak down to other people. Like you’re a obnoxious scold
Troll troll go away, come again another day! (as if your sort even need encouragement) 😘