And it’s “male” pattern violence. If you’re going to scare quote something, at least get it right.
Dhejne et al’s study absolutely *does* show male pattern violence among trans identifying males: they simply neglected to include the rather obvious analysis in their paper, as it wou…
And it’s “male” pattern violence. If you’re going to scare quote something, at least get it right.
Dhejne et al’s study absolutely *does* show male pattern violence among trans identifying males: they simply neglected to include the rather obvious analysis in their paper, as it would (of course) invalidate their biases (and yours):
Whether “cis” or not, males are still males. Or as the UK ruled, men.
As for hormones eliminating physical advantage after 2 years … you again display your overwhelming biases and underwhelming appreciation of academic scholarship:
Read those and weep for your BS claim that “hormones do eliminate physical advantage” (ever!):
Males are larger on average than females, as we are a sexually dimorphic species. Hormones don’t make trans identifying males shorter, nor do they affect myriad other aspects of male advantage (see Hilton 2020 from the link above). And comparing a bunch of out of shape TIMs to fit & athletic women … well that’s just deceptive study design.
Do you have any valid arguments or *evidence* in support of your claims?
Or are you going to flounce away now? If so, do try to stick the landing — you folks always look so silly when you land face first.
So that’s a “no” to having any evidence then. Colour me shocked.
I don’t want you gone — stop being so dramatic, it’s really not good for your mental health to entertain persecution fantasies.
I, like many sane people who follow the *actual* science (and the staggering lack thereof in support of any “trans rights” claims) want:
1. No XY in XX spaces. TIFs can choose where they want to be: as females, they face higher levels of sexual assault than males, so XX spaces are a potential refuge to them. But no one is proposing to force Buck Angel out of XY spaces.
2. Leave the kids alone.
Do whatever you like as adults.
Present however makes you happy.
On your own dime.
But female persons, women & girls that is, have rights too. And since suffrage & the Civil Rights era, there has never existed a right for males to occupy female single-sex spaces, sports, or services.
And ALL children have a right to *evidence-based* healthcare, both physical & mental, as well as a secular education — neither randos online nor untrained educators are best positioned to provide guidance on these healthcare topics, and belief in a gendered essence is as firmly rooted in material reality as Catholics’ belief in transubstantiation.
And all of us gender heretics have the right to call a male a man.
Trans “women” are men, Glau.
Just ask the UK Supreme Court.
And it’s “male” pattern violence. If you’re going to scare quote something, at least get it right.
Dhejne et al’s study absolutely *does* show male pattern violence among trans identifying males: they simply neglected to include the rather obvious analysis in their paper, as it would (of course) invalidate their biases (and yours):
https://murrayblackburnmackenzie.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/mbm-briefing-on-dhjene-et-al.-april-2021-1.pdf
Whether “cis” or not, males are still males. Or as the UK ruled, men.
As for hormones eliminating physical advantage after 2 years … you again display your overwhelming biases and underwhelming appreciation of academic scholarship:
https://www.womenarehuman.com/research-studies-confirm-trans-athletes-have-advantages-over-women/
Read those and weep for your BS claim that “hormones do eliminate physical advantage” (ever!):
Males are larger on average than females, as we are a sexually dimorphic species. Hormones don’t make trans identifying males shorter, nor do they affect myriad other aspects of male advantage (see Hilton 2020 from the link above). And comparing a bunch of out of shape TIMs to fit & athletic women … well that’s just deceptive study design.
Do you have any valid arguments or *evidence* in support of your claims?
Or are you going to flounce away now? If so, do try to stick the landing — you folks always look so silly when you land face first.
So that’s a “no” to having any evidence then. Colour me shocked.
I don’t want you gone — stop being so dramatic, it’s really not good for your mental health to entertain persecution fantasies.
I, like many sane people who follow the *actual* science (and the staggering lack thereof in support of any “trans rights” claims) want:
1. No XY in XX spaces. TIFs can choose where they want to be: as females, they face higher levels of sexual assault than males, so XX spaces are a potential refuge to them. But no one is proposing to force Buck Angel out of XY spaces.
2. Leave the kids alone.
Do whatever you like as adults.
Present however makes you happy.
On your own dime.
But female persons, women & girls that is, have rights too. And since suffrage & the Civil Rights era, there has never existed a right for males to occupy female single-sex spaces, sports, or services.
And ALL children have a right to *evidence-based* healthcare, both physical & mental, as well as a secular education — neither randos online nor untrained educators are best positioned to provide guidance on these healthcare topics, and belief in a gendered essence is as firmly rooted in material reality as Catholics’ belief in transubstantiation.
And all of us gender heretics have the right to call a male a man.
Get Ovarit.