"People will argue that "AI individuals" are people, too, and have all the same rights as humans."
Yep, I'm pretty sure I've already heard whisperings about this. I guess it'll depend how the financial motivations shake out. Is there money to be made from treating AI as a lifeforms? Does there come a point where it's genuinely intelligent…
"People will argue that "AI individuals" are people, too, and have all the same rights as humans."
Yep, I'm pretty sure I've already heard whisperings about this. I guess it'll depend how the financial motivations shake out. Is there money to be made from treating AI as a lifeforms? Does there come a point where it's genuinely intelligent? What are the real-world implications for giving AI rights?
Again, I think'll come down to money. If giving AI rights interferes with the amount of profit that can be squeezed out of it, I don't see the debate going anywhere.
"People will argue that "AI individuals" are people, too, and have all the same rights as humans."
Yep, I'm pretty sure I've already heard whisperings about this. I guess it'll depend how the financial motivations shake out. Is there money to be made from treating AI as a lifeforms? Does there come a point where it's genuinely intelligent? What are the real-world implications for giving AI rights?
Again, I think'll come down to money. If giving AI rights interferes with the amount of profit that can be squeezed out of it, I don't see the debate going anywhere.
Excellent point, Steve. It's always about the money.