I prefer to reframe the question in terms of transcending the binary distinctions which limit the meaning to be associated with humanity. The question is then usefully challenged by the distinction between human identity and that becoming ever more apparent with respect to AI. Avoiding some abstractions, is the discourse characterizing h…
I prefer to reframe the question in terms of transcending the binary distinctions which limit the meaning to be associated with humanity. The question is then usefully challenged by the distinction between human identity and that becoming ever more apparent with respect to AI. Avoiding some abstractions, is the discourse characterizing humanity to be distinguishable from that characterizing AI? Will that of AI, or with it, become "more transcendent"? One way of exploring this is through 3 or more Borromean rings -- effectively braided together -- framing the possibility of "Borromean discourse". This would be intertwined but "not touching" as a form of infinite game (https://shorturl.at/aoO68)
I prefer to reframe the question in terms of transcending the binary distinctions which limit the meaning to be associated with humanity. The question is then usefully challenged by the distinction between human identity and that becoming ever more apparent with respect to AI. Avoiding some abstractions, is the discourse characterizing humanity to be distinguishable from that characterizing AI? Will that of AI, or with it, become "more transcendent"? One way of exploring this is through 3 or more Borromean rings -- effectively braided together -- framing the possibility of "Borromean discourse". This would be intertwined but "not touching" as a form of infinite game (https://shorturl.at/aoO68)