Hmmm. For the first time in, like, ever, young Americans have shown lower approval for the artificial collection known as LGBT. And it doesn't take a lot to figure out which letter is to blame for this. As you said:
"I mean, if you’d asked a black person during the civil rights movement, or a gay person during the fight for marriage e…
Hmmm. For the first time in, like, ever, young Americans have shown lower approval for the artificial collection known as LGBT. And it doesn't take a lot to figure out which letter is to blame for this. As you said:
"I mean, if you’d asked a black person during the civil rights movement, or a gay person during the fight for marriage equality, or a feminist during the suffragette movement, what rights they wanted, they’d have been able to tell you. They had clear, measurable aims that didn’t include policing how everybody spoke about them, erasing women’s right to privacy and safety or performing experimental surgery on children. "
I was talking to a friend in Seattle a few days ago, a woman with many "trans" friends and active politically, and she too denied that children are getting hormones and surgery. I sent her some links, including, astonishingly, the long famous Boston Baby Hospital advertising their broad reassignment services.
You can bet that conservatives know about this. And god help us if the Democrats run on pronouns and bathrooms.
That is a real issue. While genuine liberalism can be seen as a better political product, the Democrat Party quest for majority dominance has led to embrace of the big tent full of people with little in common and who sometimes even despise each other. That comes with the downside of what occurs so frequently in politics. Shine a light on the other tribe's crazies and demonize them. It is often effective, even though it is illogical to see a group as it's small subset. Forgetting about the subset theory we learned as children most commonly occurs in politics.
How many will see pronouns and toilets as crazier than Trump?
Hmmm. For the first time in, like, ever, young Americans have shown lower approval for the artificial collection known as LGBT. And it doesn't take a lot to figure out which letter is to blame for this. As you said:
"I mean, if you’d asked a black person during the civil rights movement, or a gay person during the fight for marriage equality, or a feminist during the suffragette movement, what rights they wanted, they’d have been able to tell you. They had clear, measurable aims that didn’t include policing how everybody spoke about them, erasing women’s right to privacy and safety or performing experimental surgery on children. "
I was talking to a friend in Seattle a few days ago, a woman with many "trans" friends and active politically, and she too denied that children are getting hormones and surgery. I sent her some links, including, astonishingly, the long famous Boston Baby Hospital advertising their broad reassignment services.
You can bet that conservatives know about this. And god help us if the Democrats run on pronouns and bathrooms.
That is a real issue. While genuine liberalism can be seen as a better political product, the Democrat Party quest for majority dominance has led to embrace of the big tent full of people with little in common and who sometimes even despise each other. That comes with the downside of what occurs so frequently in politics. Shine a light on the other tribe's crazies and demonize them. It is often effective, even though it is illogical to see a group as it's small subset. Forgetting about the subset theory we learned as children most commonly occurs in politics.
How many will see pronouns and toilets as crazier than Trump?
It won't take too many talking about kids getting surgery over "gender ideology" to generate enough turbo-charged disgust to swing millions of votes.
True.