3 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Jacky Smith's avatar

But if those clear binary distinctions aren't true, why would you want to impose them?

Generalisations are OK until you stumble across an exception. Isn't that the whole point of this discussion?

Real life is just complicated. Enjoy it. Play with it. Roll it about. It's what makes life fun.

Expand full comment
jt's avatar

I gave You a "like" because I agree:

"Real life is just complicated. Enjoy it. Play with it. Roll it about. It's what makes life fun."

Expand full comment
jt's avatar

Because the exception proves the rule. *Perfectly* clear binary distinctions aren't true. Clear binary distinctions exist.

Otherwise, a woman becomes incapable of defining what a women even is, right?

Expand full comment