> "why not go the nuclear route? That would certainly be militarily effective in reducing Hamas’ fighting ability even further. And, of course, the sole reason, which is sadly not persuasive to some in Israel’s military, is that the cost of innocent civilians would be too great to morally defend."
> "why not go the nuclear route? That would certainly be militarily effective in reducing Hamas’ fighting ability even further. And, of course, the sole reason, which is sadly not persuasive to some in Israel’s military, is that the cost of innocent civilians would be too great to morally defend."
Could you provide any links to those in the Israeli military who have stated that using nuclear weapons on Gaza would be morally acceptable as a means of eliminating Hamas? I've never seen that but I would like to know about it if true.
> "why not go the nuclear route? That would certainly be militarily effective in reducing Hamas’ fighting ability even further. And, of course, the sole reason, which is sadly not persuasive to some in Israel’s military, is that the cost of innocent civilians would be too great to morally defend."
Could you provide any links to those in the Israeli military who have stated that using nuclear weapons on Gaza would be morally acceptable as a means of eliminating Hamas? I've never seen that but I would like to know about it if true.
Sorry, not in the military, a politician.
https://www.politico.eu/article/israel-minister-amichai-eliyahu-suspend-benjamin-netanyahu-nuclear-bomb-gaza-hamas-war/