Recent archeology and DNA analysis shows that the native who met the European immigrants 100% descended from the Clovis peoples who cross the Alaskan land bridge about 13,000 years ago - but that the North and South American continents had already been settled by a differently descended group of people starting more than 20,000 years ago…
Recent archeology and DNA analysis shows that the native who met the European immigrants 100% descended from the Clovis peoples who cross the Alaskan land bridge about 13,000 years ago - but that the North and South American continents had already been settled by a differently descended group of people starting more than 20,000 years ago. The Clovis peoples had better technology and larger numbers, causing the original inhabitants of the Americas to be conquered and completely (100%) eliminated, thousands of years before Europeans arrived in a second wave of conquest (which is more recent but much less thorough).
Whoever the ancient Jews might have conquered in moving into Judea and Samaria were almost certainly earlier conquerors of that same land. It's what human tribes do, alas.
How far do we try to unravel history and prehistory and restore the original state of things? We can't give the Americas back to the original inhabitants because the Clovis peoples (now known as "native Americans", "first nations", etc) completely eliminated them. But the Jews could be pushed out of there, and then the Arabs could be pushed out, and we could see if there are any surviving descendants of whoever occupied that land 10,000 years ago.
Recent archeology and DNA analysis shows that the native who met the European immigrants 100% descended from the Clovis peoples who cross the Alaskan land bridge about 13,000 years ago - but that the North and South American continents had already been settled by a differently descended group of people starting more than 20,000 years ago. The Clovis peoples had better technology and larger numbers, causing the original inhabitants of the Americas to be conquered and completely (100%) eliminated, thousands of years before Europeans arrived in a second wave of conquest (which is more recent but much less thorough).
Whoever the ancient Jews might have conquered in moving into Judea and Samaria were almost certainly earlier conquerors of that same land. It's what human tribes do, alas.
How far do we try to unravel history and prehistory and restore the original state of things? We can't give the Americas back to the original inhabitants because the Clovis peoples (now known as "native Americans", "first nations", etc) completely eliminated them. But the Jews could be pushed out of there, and then the Arabs could be pushed out, and we could see if there are any surviving descendants of whoever occupied that land 10,000 years ago.