It's a common theme already. Reframe something as racism (or another demonizing word) and then say "there's no two sides to racism!". I mean, you don't have a debate with Hitler, after all.
It's a fairly common tactic. Of course what it deliberately omits it that there may be two sides to the question of whether something actually IS r…
It's a common theme already. Reframe something as racism (or another demonizing word) and then say "there's no two sides to racism!". I mean, you don't have a debate with Hitler, after all.
It's a fairly common tactic. Of course what it deliberately omits it that there may be two sides to the question of whether something actually IS racism, and thus can be deemed to have only "one possible side" for any decent person worth the oxygen they consume.
It's a common theme already. Reframe something as racism (or another demonizing word) and then say "there's no two sides to racism!". I mean, you don't have a debate with Hitler, after all.
It's a fairly common tactic. Of course what it deliberately omits it that there may be two sides to the question of whether something actually IS racism, and thus can be deemed to have only "one possible side" for any decent person worth the oxygen they consume.