>"I have to say, it doesn't feel as if you're reading my replies very carefully."
I think it's a bit challenging to read one's own words and spot what could be ambiguous to others, because one KNOWS what was intended.
So when you mentally include the category of post-menopausal women in "... have been affected by abortion", I was considering the kind of life changing "affected by" criteria which you have describe several times (and which is vastly more impactful than unconsensusal child support). I happen to know a certain post menopausal woman quite well, along with many others. Most of them do not report a high level effect (of the dramatic examples you like). So I honestly did not realize that you meant to include them.
So instead I thought your reference to exceptions must refer to the post-menopausal women I had brought up.
>"I have to say, it doesn't feel as if you're reading my replies very carefully."
I think it's a bit challenging to read one's own words and spot what could be ambiguous to others, because one KNOWS what was intended.
So when you mentally include the category of post-menopausal women in "... have been affected by abortion", I was considering the kind of life changing "affected by" criteria which you have describe several times (and which is vastly more impactful than unconsensusal child support). I happen to know a certain post menopausal woman quite well, along with many others. Most of them do not report a high level effect (of the dramatic examples you like). So I honestly did not realize that you meant to include them.
So instead I thought your reference to exceptions must refer to the post-menopausal women I had brought up.
Thank you for clearing it up.