Excellent! I, for one, would ask the kid claiming that the Uni of CA is "inherently violent" because built on colonialism: why does he accept to be a student of a "colonial" and "violent" institution? if he truly believed his own words, he should give up his position and maybe offer it to a Native American. Also, he should give up all hi…
Excellent! I, for one, would ask the kid claiming that the Uni of CA is "inherently violent" because built on colonialism: why does he accept to be a student of a "colonial" and "violent" institution? if he truly believed his own words, he should give up his position and maybe offer it to a Native American. Also, he should give up all his assets that exist on "stolen land"; likewise, all adults who keep giving land acknowledgments about standing on "stolen land," should donate their houses, all sitting on stolen land, and the jobs at institutions "inherently violent." Then, they should leave the US, which is all colonized "stolen land." The only problem is that they would have to emigrate to settle on someone else's land. Whatever they would do, they couldn't escape their status of settlers.
"Excellent! I, for one, would ask the kid claiming that the Uni of CA is "inherently violent" because built on colonialism: why does he accept to be a student of a "colonial" and "violent" institution?"
Ah, that's so often the problem isn't it? It's so easy to grandstand when you don't have to sacrifice anything.
I’ve been patiently waiting for this too. And if you don’t own the “stolen” land upon which you live, find out who originally owned (or resided upon) that land and pay rent to the rightful landlord. You will be evicted, of course, but there is a real price to be paid for standing up for your principles. That is, if you really mean what you say.
"Deconstructors" standing in the civilization their ancestors built, talking about how they want to burn the whole thing down...I'd believe in them if they were actually building anything.
Excellent! I, for one, would ask the kid claiming that the Uni of CA is "inherently violent" because built on colonialism: why does he accept to be a student of a "colonial" and "violent" institution? if he truly believed his own words, he should give up his position and maybe offer it to a Native American. Also, he should give up all his assets that exist on "stolen land"; likewise, all adults who keep giving land acknowledgments about standing on "stolen land," should donate their houses, all sitting on stolen land, and the jobs at institutions "inherently violent." Then, they should leave the US, which is all colonized "stolen land." The only problem is that they would have to emigrate to settle on someone else's land. Whatever they would do, they couldn't escape their status of settlers.
"Excellent! I, for one, would ask the kid claiming that the Uni of CA is "inherently violent" because built on colonialism: why does he accept to be a student of a "colonial" and "violent" institution?"
Ah, that's so often the problem isn't it? It's so easy to grandstand when you don't have to sacrifice anything.
I’ve been patiently waiting for this too. And if you don’t own the “stolen” land upon which you live, find out who originally owned (or resided upon) that land and pay rent to the rightful landlord. You will be evicted, of course, but there is a real price to be paid for standing up for your principles. That is, if you really mean what you say.
"Deconstructors" standing in the civilization their ancestors built, talking about how they want to burn the whole thing down...I'd believe in them if they were actually building anything.