And they wonder why the right accuses them of 'grooming' and 'pedophilia'. It's because we know from a long established history that the left can't say no to anyone, including pedophiles, and this is how they're grooming fuzzy-headed progressives to accept pedophilia - yes, the old man 'identifying' as a 5-year-old is the next level. That is also an established male sexual fetish, 'adult babies'.
And they wonder why the right accuses them of 'grooming' and 'pedophilia'. It's because we know from a long established history that the left can't say no to anyone, including pedophiles, and this is how they're grooming fuzzy-headed progressives to accept pedophilia - yes, the old man 'identifying' as a 5-year-old is the next level. That is also an established male sexual fetish, 'adult babies'.
"That is also an established male sexual fetish, 'adult babies'."
It pains me slightly, but I want to make a distinction here. If somebody gets off by dressing up as a baby, I probably won't invite them to any dinner parties, but I support their right to do so in the privacy of their home. As long as there's no confusion about whether this actually *makes* them a baby, I can be pretty "live and let live" on adult babies.
The same goes, of course, for trans women. I'm regularly amazed that the TRAs haven't realised that until they started demanding to be literally considered women, until they insisted that *any* boundaries women might assert were oppression, hardly anybody had an issue with trans inclusion. It's only since people started to believe that a change of pronouns actually *makes* a man into a woman that things started going wrong.
And they wonder why the right accuses them of 'grooming' and 'pedophilia'. It's because we know from a long established history that the left can't say no to anyone, including pedophiles, and this is how they're grooming fuzzy-headed progressives to accept pedophilia - yes, the old man 'identifying' as a 5-year-old is the next level. That is also an established male sexual fetish, 'adult babies'.
"That is also an established male sexual fetish, 'adult babies'."
It pains me slightly, but I want to make a distinction here. If somebody gets off by dressing up as a baby, I probably won't invite them to any dinner parties, but I support their right to do so in the privacy of their home. As long as there's no confusion about whether this actually *makes* them a baby, I can be pretty "live and let live" on adult babies.
The same goes, of course, for trans women. I'm regularly amazed that the TRAs haven't realised that until they started demanding to be literally considered women, until they insisted that *any* boundaries women might assert were oppression, hardly anybody had an issue with trans inclusion. It's only since people started to believe that a change of pronouns actually *makes* a man into a woman that things started going wrong.