I often use that, in the quotes, because I understand that it is too broad and sweeping to be accurate, but I cannot bring myself to refer to the illiberal people who call themselves liberals as liberals. What would you suggest that I call these people, who I'm sure that you understand that I'm referring to, who have falโฆ
I often use that, in the quotes, because I understand that it is too broad and sweeping to be accurate, but I cannot bring myself to refer to the illiberal people who call themselves liberals as liberals. What would you suggest that I call these people, who I'm sure that you understand that I'm referring to, who have falsely appropriated the label liberal?
I'm not trying to start either an argument or debate with this, but you frequently heap scorn on "๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ" without ever providing justification. I would dismiss it from most people, but I consider you to be very intelligent, so it is a source of puzzlement.
I first mentioned it in the context of who decided the lopsided composition of the Supreme Court which has created a near national crisis. You once mentioned that when someone complained about something that you wrote on Medium getting your account canceled which cost you a sizable amount of money. Who the hell decided to do that to you was of great impotence to you. If the people who comment here were "the deciders" you would still have that account and would have received the money owed you. Since it seems hard to deny that who decides matters and it is the reason so many are obsessed with politics, I must be missing the context or meaning of your frequent out of the blue references to it. What am I missing?
"๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ง๐ต"
I often use that, in the quotes, because I understand that it is too broad and sweeping to be accurate, but I cannot bring myself to refer to the illiberal people who call themselves liberals as liberals. What would you suggest that I call these people, who I'm sure that you understand that I'm referring to, who have falsely appropriated the label liberal?
"๐ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ง๐ข๐ค๐ต ๐ค๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ค๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ญ๐ช๐ค๐ฆ ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ต ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ธ๐ฆ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ข๐ญ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ช๐ณ ๐ฃ๐ช๐ข๐ด๐ฆ๐ด ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ฏ๐ฐ ๐ฑ๐ข๐ต๐ช๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ค๐ฆ ๐ญ๐ฆ๐ง๐ต (๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฎ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ณ ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ฎ๐บ ๐๐๐๐) ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ "๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ" ๐ฅ๐ช๐ด๐ค๐ถ๐ด๐ด๐ช๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ด."
I'm not trying to start either an argument or debate with this, but you frequently heap scorn on "๐ธ๐ฉ๐ฐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ต๐ด ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ค๐ช๐ฅ๐ฆ" without ever providing justification. I would dismiss it from most people, but I consider you to be very intelligent, so it is a source of puzzlement.
I first mentioned it in the context of who decided the lopsided composition of the Supreme Court which has created a near national crisis. You once mentioned that when someone complained about something that you wrote on Medium getting your account canceled which cost you a sizable amount of money. Who the hell decided to do that to you was of great impotence to you. If the people who comment here were "the deciders" you would still have that account and would have received the money owed you. Since it seems hard to deny that who decides matters and it is the reason so many are obsessed with politics, I must be missing the context or meaning of your frequent out of the blue references to it. What am I missing?
"...I cannot bring myself to refer to the illiberal people who call themselves liberals as liberals."
Same here. I usually call them "the Left," but maybe "Progressives" is more apt. Or, actually, REGRESSives.