“They were silenced to whatever extent possible because they were accused of spreading mis- and/or disinformation”
Yep, happy to agree to disagree. I can’t resist addressing this point though. Does this mean that in your mind, any accusation of impropriety against someone who questions vaccine safety, and there are hundreds if not thousan…
“They were silenced to whatever extent possible because they were accused of spreading mis- and/or disinformation”
Yep, happy to agree to disagree. I can’t resist addressing this point though. Does this mean that in your mind, any accusation of impropriety against someone who questions vaccine safety, and there are hundreds if not thousands of people doing so, is suspicious? What checking mechanism are you using to ensure that this doesn’t bias you against believing genuine accusations?
In response to your questions, the first is no. I don't think the people who question these things are saints, so people are free to challenge them. But they don't. They de-platform them. Where is the debate? Why not have real dialogue? What are they afraid of? As an example, all one has to do is study what viruses are for a little while to know there is something wrong with the idea that a virus desires to kill its host. At best, the experts didn't know what to do when the pandemic hit, and at worst they lied and are still lying. The shots don't work, yet they continue to say they do. Who is responsible for the messaging?
I think it's pretty much agreed that anyone who is guilty of the evils being attributed to the various people mentioned so far, should be held accountable for them, no matter who they are, or how powerful and influential they may be. Conversely, the accused should have their day in court to make their case. Right off, I would assert that we are not seeing that. We are seeing some get accused, and immediately found guilty by big tech and others of the crimes. Others are protected. Why is that?
Many in the medical/pharmaceutical field have been shown to be either wrong, or lying, or both. They continue to do so at the expense of those who believe them. They tell us to follow the science, but they don't do it themselves. Viruses are not new. They have been here, and will continue to mutate and be here until the end of time. Propaganda is sometimes hard to distinguish, but the general public seems ripe for the picking, and propagandist remain forever ready to exploit them.
I care about the truth, no matter where if comes from. I may not always recognize it, but I spend a lot of time pursuing it. I believe that good people are being harmed by those who are only interested in power and riches, and I believe that good people are trying to expose the others. They will be attacked for doing so. I believe we are seeing a lot that these days because these people are getting too close to breaking through the shroud of deceit. I'm not saying those pushing back are saints, but I will always question the timing of the decision to publicize their alleged misdeeds.
Thank you for the opportunity to actually discuss an issue. It's appreciated.
“They were silenced to whatever extent possible because they were accused of spreading mis- and/or disinformation”
Yep, happy to agree to disagree. I can’t resist addressing this point though. Does this mean that in your mind, any accusation of impropriety against someone who questions vaccine safety, and there are hundreds if not thousands of people doing so, is suspicious? What checking mechanism are you using to ensure that this doesn’t bias you against believing genuine accusations?
In response to your questions, the first is no. I don't think the people who question these things are saints, so people are free to challenge them. But they don't. They de-platform them. Where is the debate? Why not have real dialogue? What are they afraid of? As an example, all one has to do is study what viruses are for a little while to know there is something wrong with the idea that a virus desires to kill its host. At best, the experts didn't know what to do when the pandemic hit, and at worst they lied and are still lying. The shots don't work, yet they continue to say they do. Who is responsible for the messaging?
I think it's pretty much agreed that anyone who is guilty of the evils being attributed to the various people mentioned so far, should be held accountable for them, no matter who they are, or how powerful and influential they may be. Conversely, the accused should have their day in court to make their case. Right off, I would assert that we are not seeing that. We are seeing some get accused, and immediately found guilty by big tech and others of the crimes. Others are protected. Why is that?
Many in the medical/pharmaceutical field have been shown to be either wrong, or lying, or both. They continue to do so at the expense of those who believe them. They tell us to follow the science, but they don't do it themselves. Viruses are not new. They have been here, and will continue to mutate and be here until the end of time. Propaganda is sometimes hard to distinguish, but the general public seems ripe for the picking, and propagandist remain forever ready to exploit them.
I care about the truth, no matter where if comes from. I may not always recognize it, but I spend a lot of time pursuing it. I believe that good people are being harmed by those who are only interested in power and riches, and I believe that good people are trying to expose the others. They will be attacked for doing so. I believe we are seeing a lot that these days because these people are getting too close to breaking through the shroud of deceit. I'm not saying those pushing back are saints, but I will always question the timing of the decision to publicize their alleged misdeeds.
Thank you for the opportunity to actually discuss an issue. It's appreciated.