The woman claims an IQ "close to 200" That would place her above Isaac Newton and close to Goethe. Based on her writing, vocabulary, logic, and order of presentation, I would not believe anything over 130 and more likely around 115.
I have a pretty high IQ but if I do anything to demonstrate it, I would do so by using it, not boasting abo…
The woman claims an IQ "close to 200" That would place her above Isaac Newton and close to Goethe. Based on her writing, vocabulary, logic, and order of presentation, I would not believe anything over 130 and more likely around 115.
I have a pretty high IQ but if I do anything to demonstrate it, I would do so by using it, not boasting about it.
That impossible boast makes it hard to believe anything she writes. And the repeated CEO thing just compounds it.
The writing is shabby:
"I am a CEO that brings people together"
Anyone with an IQ much past average would use the relative pronoun "who" in place of "that" here.
"I caught sight of this beautiful woman with a tattoo of a beautiful woman on her leg."
Yeah, exactly. It's preposterous. As I've said before, hyperbole is the language of the internet, so I usually let the occasional silly boast slide. And the incredible, amazing, life-changing, paradigm-shifting work she claims to be doing was irrelevant to her point.
But most intreating to me was the simultaneous lack of any emotional regulation and the self-awareness to recognise the emotions she was feeling. And also I guess, the sense to disappear once I called her out on the aforementioned hyperbole.
The woman claims an IQ "close to 200" That would place her above Isaac Newton and close to Goethe. Based on her writing, vocabulary, logic, and order of presentation, I would not believe anything over 130 and more likely around 115.
I have a pretty high IQ but if I do anything to demonstrate it, I would do so by using it, not boasting about it.
That impossible boast makes it hard to believe anything she writes. And the repeated CEO thing just compounds it.
The writing is shabby:
"I am a CEO that brings people together"
Anyone with an IQ much past average would use the relative pronoun "who" in place of "that" here.
"I caught sight of this beautiful woman with a tattoo of a beautiful woman on her leg."
Count the awkwardnesses.
You were debating a fraud.
"The woman claims an IQ "close to 200""
Yeah, exactly. It's preposterous. As I've said before, hyperbole is the language of the internet, so I usually let the occasional silly boast slide. And the incredible, amazing, life-changing, paradigm-shifting work she claims to be doing was irrelevant to her point.
But most intreating to me was the simultaneous lack of any emotional regulation and the self-awareness to recognise the emotions she was feeling. And also I guess, the sense to disappear once I called her out on the aforementioned hyperbole.