What difference does it make? If the Court rolls back Griswold, we'll be as BC-less as we now are largely abortin-less.
I wish the right was as quick to outlaw going to another state to get 'gender affirming care' for one's kid as the were for those seeking legal abortions.
What difference does it make? If the Court rolls back Griswold, we'll be as BC-less as we now are largely abortin-less.
I wish the right was as quick to outlaw going to another state to get 'gender affirming care' for one's kid as the were for those seeking legal abortions.
They won't roll it back. The only one who has even hinted at this is Thomas. There are some repubes who would like to see this happen but it's far too regressive. You have to keep in mind whether things are politically feasible or not. This one isn't.
They'll find a way if enough are on board. Remember when we thought Roe was here to stay? Never underestimate how much many men (and not always conservatives) hate female freedom. And freedom from unwanted, life-limiting childbearing lies at the heart of everything 'wrong' with feminism. Never say never.
What difference does it make? If the Court rolls back Griswold, we'll be as BC-less as we now are largely abortin-less.
I wish the right was as quick to outlaw going to another state to get 'gender affirming care' for one's kid as the were for those seeking legal abortions.
They won't roll it back. The only one who has even hinted at this is Thomas. There are some repubes who would like to see this happen but it's far too regressive. You have to keep in mind whether things are politically feasible or not. This one isn't.
They'll find a way if enough are on board. Remember when we thought Roe was here to stay? Never underestimate how much many men (and not always conservatives) hate female freedom. And freedom from unwanted, life-limiting childbearing lies at the heart of everything 'wrong' with feminism. Never say never.