2 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Chris Fox's avatar

"The differences could be 100% due to environment and 0% due to genetics (hypothetically)"

The last word doesn't mitigate it.

OK, sorry if I sounded like I was bristling. I wasn't, but I see how it could read that way. Fair do's.

Expand full comment
Passion guided by reason's avatar

OK, thanks. The last word was not meant to mitigate anything, but to explain that I was presenting a hypothetical rather than an assertion. Read it in the spirit of "EVEN IF the differences were 100% environmental... certain issues remain". I appreciate your explaining; I do not always anticipate all the ways something I write can be interpreted, so this is helpful.

Expand full comment