"John McWhorter suggests calling 'woke' antiracism 'neoracism' since it's what's become 'respectable' on the far left and it's every bit as identitarian as the identity politics of the right"
Yep, I've ben calling it neoracism for a while too. The name just fits so perfectly. And as T so ably demonstrates, the neoracists have no problem b…
"John McWhorter suggests calling 'woke' antiracism 'neoracism' since it's what's become 'respectable' on the far left and it's every bit as identitarian as the identity politics of the right"
Yep, I've ben calling it neoracism for a while too. The name just fits so perfectly. And as T so ably demonstrates, the neoracists have no problem being just as racist as the worst of the dreaded "far right" if they encounter a person of colour with "the wrong opinion." The hypocrisy makes me sick.
Anybody calling Neely's death a "lynching" is completely ignorant of what a lynching is. And doesn't *care* what it is. It's just a handy word to justify whatever reflected victimhood they want to claim.
"John McWhorter suggests calling 'woke' antiracism 'neoracism' since it's what's become 'respectable' on the far left and it's every bit as identitarian as the identity politics of the right"
Yep, I've ben calling it neoracism for a while too. The name just fits so perfectly. And as T so ably demonstrates, the neoracists have no problem being just as racist as the worst of the dreaded "far right" if they encounter a person of colour with "the wrong opinion." The hypocrisy makes me sick.
Anybody calling Neely's death a "lynching" is completely ignorant of what a lynching is. And doesn't *care* what it is. It's just a handy word to justify whatever reflected victimhood they want to claim.