Holy fudge! I don't know how you do it, unless you've been graced with the patience of a saint. I find that people who reason like Daniel seem more interested in the theory of racism instead of discussing how to solve it. They've discussed the topic so much that they now inhabit a whole new stratosphere of logic that is foreign to many of us. In an case, keep up the good work.
Holy fudge! I don't know how you do it, unless you've been graced with the patience of a saint. I find that people who reason like Daniel seem more interested in the theory of racism instead of discussing how to solve it. They've discussed the topic so much that they now inhabit a whole new stratosphere of logic that is foreign to many of us. In an case, keep up the good work.
"I find that people who reason like Daniel seem more interested in the theory of racism instead of discussing how to solve it."
Yep, absolutely nailed it. What would he have to complain about if serious efforts were made to fix the problem? As I said, the fascinating about Daniel, in our other conversations too, is that behind all the bluster and hyperbole, we seem to mostly agree on the path forward.
Holy fudge! I don't know how you do it, unless you've been graced with the patience of a saint. I find that people who reason like Daniel seem more interested in the theory of racism instead of discussing how to solve it. They've discussed the topic so much that they now inhabit a whole new stratosphere of logic that is foreign to many of us. In an case, keep up the good work.
"I find that people who reason like Daniel seem more interested in the theory of racism instead of discussing how to solve it."
Yep, absolutely nailed it. What would he have to complain about if serious efforts were made to fix the problem? As I said, the fascinating about Daniel, in our other conversations too, is that behind all the bluster and hyperbole, we seem to mostly agree on the path forward.