What will be a bigger buzz kill will be for those many conservatives who find they're not extreme enough for the ne regime. We've seen in both fascist & communist societies what happens to people who aren't 'on board' enough.
The blood that runs in the streets won't just be liberals'.
What will be a bigger buzz kill will be for those many conservatives who find they're not extreme enough for the ne regime. We've seen in both fascist & communist societies what happens to people who aren't 'on board' enough.
The blood that runs in the streets won't just be liberals'.
Yep, as Bogdan Raditsa famously said, "Be careful about people whose vocabulary is yours but whose record wherever they hold power is your destruction. Do not be Koristne Budale. Do not be ЁЭШЬЁЭШ┤ЁЭШжЁЭШзЁЭШ╢ЁЭШн ЁЭШРЁЭШпЁЭШпЁЭШ░ЁЭШдЁЭШжЁЭШпЁЭШ╡ЁЭШ┤."
I think that this points to the problem with political labels. The often don't mean what people think that they mean and leave incorrect impressions, especially considering how many would/could not walk their talk.
As you know, I keep a finger in the air by maintaining contact with as much diversity as possible. I often can even see why they believe what they do.
The White Christian Nationalists, if the link is to be believed, don't want anyone in my family in America. I won't be joining their club. I don't think that all Christians are that radical though. My fallout from Christianity came long ago. If I were to spend eternity praising the god who is burning my wife, the woman I love, in eternal torment because she couldn't bring herself to believe a fabulous story, would my eternal heaven be less of a hell than hers?
Are conservatives who shout, "America first" Fascists or people tired of seeing billions of taxpayer dollars going to other countries, too often for wars?
Are the champions of victimhood representative of liberals?
Does the word liberal mean what people think, or wish, that it means?
Are protestors all non-violent or violent because it is what we wish for the tribes we like or don't like?
Are the people who go out and about wearing "tactical" shit any different from people who wear a cowboy hat and boots who don't know how to ride a horse?
I see old Vietnam vets talking as if they are still the lean, mean, killing machines that they were 50+ years ago who couldn't sprint to their mailbox. Not to mention that they were not going against their own government, they (OK, we) were doing what we did with the government's blessing.
I could go on and on, but I think you should be able to get my point. Anyone who is all that a political label says that they are is a standout idiot in a crowd of idiots. Most of the talk, especially on the internet, is empty talk. I think that fears of widespread violence are overblown (I sure hope I'm right about that).
If I was worried about blood in the streets I'd go out and buy an AR-15 (I don't have one) and think that anyone worried about it who doesn't have one is just talking. From what I've been reading, current AR-15 buyers are "liberals." As a friend said to me, "Us lefties like our guns too."
I need to disagree with you on the labels thing. It's been my experience since I was quite young that most people strive to fit into categories. They look for some movement or some fad to swear allegiance to and they put a lot of effort into maximizing their conformity.
This is everywhere. From the MAGA fools to whom "Trump won" is an iconic declaration of crazy to the "trans" crowd with its inane ideological rigidity to the enthusiastic adoption of fads.
I am on a job site called Braintrust that has turned out to be utterly useless. When I started to gripe about 90% of the jobs being marked "US only" when half the the freelancers on there reside outside the USA, I got a message from one of the staff that opened with
"I am reaching out to share [the rules of online engagement]," (which I had not violated at all).
Reach out? Share? WTF does that even mean? Why not plain speech like "I am emailing you to remind ..." but this is the new corpspeak and everyone is doing it.
Nobody had to indoctrinate them. They saw other people writing this burble and leapt right on board.
Most people are compulsively conformist. Most people look for something to join. Political attitudes in the USA are not a continuum like height or intelligence, they are a bimodal distribution and we are getting ever further apart. Under Bush we could live with each other; since Trump, we are divided into distinct camps and I see little chance of this reversing anytime soon.
You've probably heard the one about an alien invasion from outer space being the only thing that would unite humanity. Right now I would not even bet on that.
When the new corporate speak was beginning, we made paper buzzword/bullshit BINGO cards and some of us took them to meetings. When someone, usually a manager, used one of those ridiculous words if it was on our card word mark it. At some point in the meeting someone would say, "BINGO! that a good point you were making" or some other nonsense to make it less obvious that we were making fun of corporate speak. it didn't stay a secret long.
Sadly, making fun of some of the new words could get you fired.
I'm in agreement with that but you also address the idea that I expressed. In the new order of the 21st Century it is hard to cling to the group identities of the old order. They have become so fractured that people increasingly either reject them outright or clarify their subgroup.
You for an example, a long-time proud liberal, do not fit under the Orwellian new definitions the radicals impose. I am seeing an increasing number of people seceding from groups they were previously comfortable in.
I think it is the result of subgroups trying to claim membership where they don't fit. A glaring example is LGBTQ[whatever else is being added]. The L & G people have an attraction to their own sex (something in common). Sex is fun. The B people are happy to have it with whomever will participate with them. If they have a preference, they seem to be able to get past it. The T people are split between the dysphoric and non-dysphoric. The Q people are outrage junkies. I don't see it as a unified group/tribe and think that some actually despise or hold one or mor of the others in contempt.
Perhaps it time to dust off our copies of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals." in a strange new world where it is radical to be rational. While I dislike the "enemies" world, sometimes we do have genuine enemies. Hopefully without thinking we must kill them, rather than their ideas.
I hope you're right about the violence too. I'm never sure if I have a skewed idea of how crazy America has become because I haven't lived there in nearly 18 years, or whether those who are still there are the ones who need their head examined. There's some crazy shit going down there, and I was reading some Canadian articles yesterday analyzing the possibility of a US civil war, and how that would impact Canada. And I was like, shit, 35 million people are screwed unless we all head up to the mountains and let the military hordes have Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. We've still got plenty of water up there, and maybe we can train the polar bears to attack anything red white and blue :)
I worry about my family there. They're in Michigan now, but my bro and his wife are going to move to NC after my mother passes on and I really don't think they've thought this thing through.
Glad to hear though that you don't think it's time yet to buy an AR. If a grizzled old Vietnam vet isn't crapping his drawers yet, maybe there's hope...or maybe you just need your head examined :P
I just read an article that US alcohol deaths went up like 30% in the first year of the pandemic. I know opioid deaths spiralled during the pandemic, and many were believed to be intentional overdoses - i.e., suicides.
Then again, maybe the Big One is just around the corner if no one stops Putin and most of us won't be around for Christmas :P
If violence comes, I don't think it will be like the war of secession with uniformed armies. I think its most likely form would be terrorist tactics. If it goes past assassination attempts on politicians to non-government members of the other tribe, uniforms will be political bumper stickers and shirts. I have some shirts from years ago that I never wear, they'd make good rags. Bumper stickers, hell no. No matter which tribe. they make you a target of the other tribe. Who knows if and when that might happen. You could have a house full of guns and ammo and get sniped. Better to do as little as possible to make yourself a target of opportunity.
When I lived in the States I had anti-Bush bumper stickers in my car and my tires kept getting slashed. I had no enemies, no crazy exes, I figured it must be the bumper stickers. As much as I resented having to take them off - early right-wing censorship (today it's more left-wing censorship), I consoled myself thinking, "They won the battle but I won the war. They have to live in this shitty country that's destroying them and I'm moving to a free country.' Kind of an ugly thing to think about the mother country but that's how I felt twenty years ago...the US was going downhill but I had no idea how bad it was going to get.
What weirds me out is going down there and knowing some nutbag with a gun and a grievance could show up and mow everyone down. While i realize the likelihood of that happening is fairly small, it's not as small as it was a few years ago. But then I walk into a CVS or a Kroger's or something and everyone's all normal and stuff.
What will be a bigger buzz kill will be for those many conservatives who find they're not extreme enough for the ne regime. We've seen in both fascist & communist societies what happens to people who aren't 'on board' enough.
The blood that runs in the streets won't just be liberals'.
Sorta like the French Revolution where a lot of people who had been at its center ended up losing their heads.
Authoritarianism always looks like a good idea to those who favour such personalities...until the paranoia sets in.
Yep, as Bogdan Raditsa famously said, "Be careful about people whose vocabulary is yours but whose record wherever they hold power is your destruction. Do not be Koristne Budale. Do not be ЁЭШЬЁЭШ┤ЁЭШжЁЭШзЁЭШ╢ЁЭШн ЁЭШРЁЭШпЁЭШпЁЭШ░ЁЭШдЁЭШжЁЭШпЁЭШ╡ЁЭШ┤."
I think that this points to the problem with political labels. The often don't mean what people think that they mean and leave incorrect impressions, especially considering how many would/could not walk their talk.
As you know, I keep a finger in the air by maintaining contact with as much diversity as possible. I often can even see why they believe what they do.
The White Christian Nationalists, if the link is to be believed, don't want anyone in my family in America. I won't be joining their club. I don't think that all Christians are that radical though. My fallout from Christianity came long ago. If I were to spend eternity praising the god who is burning my wife, the woman I love, in eternal torment because she couldn't bring herself to believe a fabulous story, would my eternal heaven be less of a hell than hers?
Are conservatives who shout, "America first" Fascists or people tired of seeing billions of taxpayer dollars going to other countries, too often for wars?
Are the champions of victimhood representative of liberals?
Does the word liberal mean what people think, or wish, that it means?
Are protestors all non-violent or violent because it is what we wish for the tribes we like or don't like?
Are the people who go out and about wearing "tactical" shit any different from people who wear a cowboy hat and boots who don't know how to ride a horse?
I see old Vietnam vets talking as if they are still the lean, mean, killing machines that they were 50+ years ago who couldn't sprint to their mailbox. Not to mention that they were not going against their own government, they (OK, we) were doing what we did with the government's blessing.
I could go on and on, but I think you should be able to get my point. Anyone who is all that a political label says that they are is a standout idiot in a crowd of idiots. Most of the talk, especially on the internet, is empty talk. I think that fears of widespread violence are overblown (I sure hope I'm right about that).
If I was worried about blood in the streets I'd go out and buy an AR-15 (I don't have one) and think that anyone worried about it who doesn't have one is just talking. From what I've been reading, current AR-15 buyers are "liberals." As a friend said to me, "Us lefties like our guns too."
I need to disagree with you on the labels thing. It's been my experience since I was quite young that most people strive to fit into categories. They look for some movement or some fad to swear allegiance to and they put a lot of effort into maximizing their conformity.
This is everywhere. From the MAGA fools to whom "Trump won" is an iconic declaration of crazy to the "trans" crowd with its inane ideological rigidity to the enthusiastic adoption of fads.
I am on a job site called Braintrust that has turned out to be utterly useless. When I started to gripe about 90% of the jobs being marked "US only" when half the the freelancers on there reside outside the USA, I got a message from one of the staff that opened with
"I am reaching out to share [the rules of online engagement]," (which I had not violated at all).
Reach out? Share? WTF does that even mean? Why not plain speech like "I am emailing you to remind ..." but this is the new corpspeak and everyone is doing it.
Nobody had to indoctrinate them. They saw other people writing this burble and leapt right on board.
Most people are compulsively conformist. Most people look for something to join. Political attitudes in the USA are not a continuum like height or intelligence, they are a bimodal distribution and we are getting ever further apart. Under Bush we could live with each other; since Trump, we are divided into distinct camps and I see little chance of this reversing anytime soon.
You've probably heard the one about an alien invasion from outer space being the only thing that would unite humanity. Right now I would not even bet on that.
When the new corporate speak was beginning, we made paper buzzword/bullshit BINGO cards and some of us took them to meetings. When someone, usually a manager, used one of those ridiculous words if it was on our card word mark it. At some point in the meeting someone would say, "BINGO! that a good point you were making" or some other nonsense to make it less obvious that we were making fun of corporate speak. it didn't stay a secret long.
Sadly, making fun of some of the new words could get you fired.
They indoctrinate each other.
I'm in agreement with that but you also address the idea that I expressed. In the new order of the 21st Century it is hard to cling to the group identities of the old order. They have become so fractured that people increasingly either reject them outright or clarify their subgroup.
You for an example, a long-time proud liberal, do not fit under the Orwellian new definitions the radicals impose. I am seeing an increasing number of people seceding from groups they were previously comfortable in.
I think it is the result of subgroups trying to claim membership where they don't fit. A glaring example is LGBTQ[whatever else is being added]. The L & G people have an attraction to their own sex (something in common). Sex is fun. The B people are happy to have it with whomever will participate with them. If they have a preference, they seem to be able to get past it. The T people are split between the dysphoric and non-dysphoric. The Q people are outrage junkies. I don't see it as a unified group/tribe and think that some actually despise or hold one or mor of the others in contempt.
Perhaps it time to dust off our copies of Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals." in a strange new world where it is radical to be rational. While I dislike the "enemies" world, sometimes we do have genuine enemies. Hopefully without thinking we must kill them, rather than their ideas.
I hope you're right about the violence too. I'm never sure if I have a skewed idea of how crazy America has become because I haven't lived there in nearly 18 years, or whether those who are still there are the ones who need their head examined. There's some crazy shit going down there, and I was reading some Canadian articles yesterday analyzing the possibility of a US civil war, and how that would impact Canada. And I was like, shit, 35 million people are screwed unless we all head up to the mountains and let the military hordes have Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver. We've still got plenty of water up there, and maybe we can train the polar bears to attack anything red white and blue :)
I worry about my family there. They're in Michigan now, but my bro and his wife are going to move to NC after my mother passes on and I really don't think they've thought this thing through.
Glad to hear though that you don't think it's time yet to buy an AR. If a grizzled old Vietnam vet isn't crapping his drawers yet, maybe there's hope...or maybe you just need your head examined :P
I just read an article that US alcohol deaths went up like 30% in the first year of the pandemic. I know opioid deaths spiralled during the pandemic, and many were believed to be intentional overdoses - i.e., suicides.
Then again, maybe the Big One is just around the corner if no one stops Putin and most of us won't be around for Christmas :P
If violence comes, I don't think it will be like the war of secession with uniformed armies. I think its most likely form would be terrorist tactics. If it goes past assassination attempts on politicians to non-government members of the other tribe, uniforms will be political bumper stickers and shirts. I have some shirts from years ago that I never wear, they'd make good rags. Bumper stickers, hell no. No matter which tribe. they make you a target of the other tribe. Who knows if and when that might happen. You could have a house full of guns and ammo and get sniped. Better to do as little as possible to make yourself a target of opportunity.
When I lived in the States I had anti-Bush bumper stickers in my car and my tires kept getting slashed. I had no enemies, no crazy exes, I figured it must be the bumper stickers. As much as I resented having to take them off - early right-wing censorship (today it's more left-wing censorship), I consoled myself thinking, "They won the battle but I won the war. They have to live in this shitty country that's destroying them and I'm moving to a free country.' Kind of an ugly thing to think about the mother country but that's how I felt twenty years ago...the US was going downhill but I had no idea how bad it was going to get.
What weirds me out is going down there and knowing some nutbag with a gun and a grievance could show up and mow everyone down. While i realize the likelihood of that happening is fairly small, it's not as small as it was a few years ago. But then I walk into a CVS or a Kroger's or something and everyone's all normal and stuff.