True, you didn't have to hate Trump to see it. Anyone who has lived with a loved one with dementia would recognize the signs clearly. My reference was to what it would take to willfully ignore/deny it, Trump hate or partisโฆ
True, you didn't have to hate Trump to see it. Anyone who has lived with a loved one with dementia would recognize the signs clearly. My reference was to what it would take to willfully ignore/deny it, Trump hate or partisanship.
As for "right-wing sources" reporting it, of course. You don't expect the left-wing sources to mention it do you? I use WSJ, Reuters, Asia Times, CNN, NPR, Reason and Daily Wire to get a spread across the spectrum of bias. When I was young and my hearing supported it and there was no internet, I was a short-wave radio listener. VOA, BBC, Russia, Voice of Vietnam via Cuba (I heard Jane Fonda's speech), and miscellaneous stations depending upon condition to get that spread. None of those supply discernment, you must supply your own. If you are not too partisan for that you step out of the echo chamber.
As an interesting side note, at one time I had a job analyzing RF signals pertaining to electronic warfare. Between missions I was listening to the VOA broadcast of a UN security council meeting. Anwar Sฤdฤt was making the US look like absolute assholes and the signal appeared to fade until he could not be heard. There was no fade, the signal was tall and proud on my spectrum analyzer. The noise was modulated in at the source on every VOA frequency. When he finished speaking the fade went away. The Voice of America had jammed itself! A lesson about media bias when I was a young man that led to my quest for information source diversity.
How often does All Sides update that chart? Because I recognize several that jump up and down, back and forth on factualism and bias. I wouldn't put the National Review as far right as they have, but it's still for sure right-wing. Cnn & Fox News both bounce up and down for factualism, so does MSNBC. The Epoch Times and the Washington Examiner are both far right, not sort of right. I prefer Media Bias Fact Check myself, although none of them are the final word on everything.
Maybe I don't know the signs of dementia when I see them, but I do watch for them in my mother, and from what I read in Bob Woodward's books, Trump was handled like a spoiled, easily distracted child by his handlers when he was in office. I don't know if folks are doing the same to Biden but I suspect not. Are you sure it's dementia and not just encroaching old age? Like I said, we all get a little fuzzier as we get older, I can literally completely forget something from a few days previously and it's not that I'm getting senile, that's just how older age is for many of us and my mother was the same at my age...yet 31 years later, at 90, she's sharper than Trump. I dunno, I just don't see it in Biden but then again, we had no idea Reagan was getting fuzzy in his old age, and supposedly his family & handlers hid it from the American public until his second term was over.
I wrote that you must supply your own discernment too all needs sources. The best you can do is seek variety.. You're picking fly crap out of the pepper shaker with toothpick chopsticks trying to find fault with my non -medical opinion about one subject, Biden's mental fitness to be POTUS. That's not about partisanship. Call it what you like, but claiming he is ok to be POTUS is stunning.
I don't know why you keep mentioning Trump, be has nothing to do with it. Yeah Trump was a dumpster fire but he is no longer in office and has nothing to do with Biden.
You haven't yet explained why you thought Biden was showing signs of dementia. Although I understand better where you get your news, I still don't know why you think he's getting fuzzy.
I've listened to his responses to questions and critics. He seems pretty sharp to me. He tracks just fine, while Trump can't speak a coherent sentence without weaving into one of his grievances or his stock phrases ("crooked Hillary," "with hunt," "China virus") and he never uses conjunctive adverbs like "however" at all.
"๐ ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ฅ๐ช๐ฅ๐ฏ'๐ต ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ต๐ฆ ๐๐ณ๐ถ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐ต๐ฐ ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ค๐ญ๐ฆ๐ข๐ณ ๐ด๐ช๐จ๐ฏ๐ด ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ช๐ต ๐ช๐ฏ ๐ฉ๐ช๐ฎ"
True, you didn't have to hate Trump to see it. Anyone who has lived with a loved one with dementia would recognize the signs clearly. My reference was to what it would take to willfully ignore/deny it, Trump hate or partisanship.
As for "right-wing sources" reporting it, of course. You don't expect the left-wing sources to mention it do you? I use WSJ, Reuters, Asia Times, CNN, NPR, Reason and Daily Wire to get a spread across the spectrum of bias. When I was young and my hearing supported it and there was no internet, I was a short-wave radio listener. VOA, BBC, Russia, Voice of Vietnam via Cuba (I heard Jane Fonda's speech), and miscellaneous stations depending upon condition to get that spread. None of those supply discernment, you must supply your own. If you are not too partisan for that you step out of the echo chamber.
https://www.allsides.com/media-bias/media-bias-chart
As an interesting side note, at one time I had a job analyzing RF signals pertaining to electronic warfare. Between missions I was listening to the VOA broadcast of a UN security council meeting. Anwar Sฤdฤt was making the US look like absolute assholes and the signal appeared to fade until he could not be heard. There was no fade, the signal was tall and proud on my spectrum analyzer. The noise was modulated in at the source on every VOA frequency. When he finished speaking the fade went away. The Voice of America had jammed itself! A lesson about media bias when I was a young man that led to my quest for information source diversity.
How often does All Sides update that chart? Because I recognize several that jump up and down, back and forth on factualism and bias. I wouldn't put the National Review as far right as they have, but it's still for sure right-wing. Cnn & Fox News both bounce up and down for factualism, so does MSNBC. The Epoch Times and the Washington Examiner are both far right, not sort of right. I prefer Media Bias Fact Check myself, although none of them are the final word on everything.
Maybe I don't know the signs of dementia when I see them, but I do watch for them in my mother, and from what I read in Bob Woodward's books, Trump was handled like a spoiled, easily distracted child by his handlers when he was in office. I don't know if folks are doing the same to Biden but I suspect not. Are you sure it's dementia and not just encroaching old age? Like I said, we all get a little fuzzier as we get older, I can literally completely forget something from a few days previously and it's not that I'm getting senile, that's just how older age is for many of us and my mother was the same at my age...yet 31 years later, at 90, she's sharper than Trump. I dunno, I just don't see it in Biden but then again, we had no idea Reagan was getting fuzzy in his old age, and supposedly his family & handlers hid it from the American public until his second term was over.
I wrote that you must supply your own discernment too all needs sources. The best you can do is seek variety.. You're picking fly crap out of the pepper shaker with toothpick chopsticks trying to find fault with my non -medical opinion about one subject, Biden's mental fitness to be POTUS. That's not about partisanship. Call it what you like, but claiming he is ok to be POTUS is stunning.
I don't know why you keep mentioning Trump, be has nothing to do with it. Yeah Trump was a dumpster fire but he is no longer in office and has nothing to do with Biden.
You haven't yet explained why you thought Biden was showing signs of dementia. Although I understand better where you get your news, I still don't know why you think he's getting fuzzy.
I've listened to his responses to questions and critics. He seems pretty sharp to me. He tracks just fine, while Trump can't speak a coherent sentence without weaving into one of his grievances or his stock phrases ("crooked Hillary," "with hunt," "China virus") and he never uses conjunctive adverbs like "however" at all.