"Two people going back and forth saying, “yes, you’re right,” doesn't make for very compelling reading." This comment you made makes sense, but I wonder if there's ever conversations you have where perspectived anf nuances differ… and you agree to disagree. That might be interesting once in a while. Just a thought. I admire your patience in bantering with Daniel and others in your articles!
"Two people going back and forth saying, “yes, you’re right,” doesn't make for very compelling reading." This comment you made makes sense, but I wonder if there's ever conversations you have where perspectived anf nuances differ… and you agree to disagree. That might be interesting once in a while. Just a thought. I admire your patience in bantering with Daniel and others in your articles!
Haha, I'm not really an "agree to disagree" kind of guy 😁. I like to talk things out until we really get somewhere. But, there are definitely some conversations where there's good-natured disagreement. This one's a good example:
"Two people going back and forth saying, “yes, you’re right,” doesn't make for very compelling reading." This comment you made makes sense, but I wonder if there's ever conversations you have where perspectived anf nuances differ… and you agree to disagree. That might be interesting once in a while. Just a thought. I admire your patience in bantering with Daniel and others in your articles!
Haha, I'm not really an "agree to disagree" kind of guy 😁. I like to talk things out until we really get somewhere. But, there are definitely some conversations where there's good-natured disagreement. This one's a good example:
https://steveqj.substack.com/p/no-not-betrayal-disempowerment
or this one:
https://steveqj.substack.com/p/see-some-black-man-gets-it/comments
(hmm, just noticing that both of these conversations are behind the paywall. I should put more of these out front.)