Yeah, the marxists (like the Fields and Adolph Reed) are big on their analytical categories and the historical and capitalist why of race, they call it ascriptive identity category, like you mentioned. I think their work is the key to undoing a lot of this antiracism mess, as they show why its so popular, it serves neoliberalism
Yeah, the marxists (like the Fields and Adolph Reed) are big on their analytical categories and the historical and capitalist why of race, they call it ascriptive identity category, like you mentioned. I think their work is the key to undoing a lot of this antiracism mess, as they show why its so popular, it serves neoliberalism
it should also be noted, MLK was moving in this direction, in 68, talking about redistributive economics as the way to deal with inequality amongst blacks. So, we come back around to Kingian politics and takes as ultimately being more radical really, than nationalist takes.
Yeah, the marxists (like the Fields and Adolph Reed) are big on their analytical categories and the historical and capitalist why of race, they call it ascriptive identity category, like you mentioned. I think their work is the key to undoing a lot of this antiracism mess, as they show why its so popular, it serves neoliberalism
it should also be noted, MLK was moving in this direction, in 68, talking about redistributive economics as the way to deal with inequality amongst blacks. So, we come back around to Kingian politics and takes as ultimately being more radical really, than nationalist takes.