I *get* why men outside the transnuts support this; on some level, many men want to 'help out a bro' in supporting a sexual fetish he himself probably doesn't share; because who knows what those feminazis will come after next??? What if they go after porn and prostitution? Droning on about sex trafficking, which NEVER happens? What I don…
I *get* why men outside the transnuts support this; on some level, many men want to 'help out a bro' in supporting a sexual fetish he himself probably doesn't share; because who knows what those feminazis will come after next??? What if they go after porn and prostitution? Droning on about sex trafficking, which NEVER happens? What I don't understand is why *women* go along with this, although someone in my comments section this weekend came up with a damned good theory: That this is another way for bad actors to prey upon women (and I would add, children) sexually. They create the woke cognitive confusion that what they do isn't sex ("gender dysphoria"), that the less woke groomed a woman is, the less cognitive confusion she has, and the more instantaneous the recognition of unwanted sex is, and that they groom adults to accept the fictional trans children is non-sexual in nature when it is frankly so.
I wrote an article a few months ago arguing that 'trans grooming' also includes the grooming of adults to accept, eventually, pedophilia, I talked about 'MAPs', and said I didn't think the woke would offer any barriers when the pedos came to them and said, "If your child is old enough to know what they are [gender-wise], they're old enough to know who they want to have sex with and your child says they want to have sex with me. Children know what's best for them, as you're fond of saying. Butt out!"
I really do believe this is where it's going, because the woke have been grooming themselves with its 'inclusivity' obsession and desire to be sexually open - you know, not like those sourpussed tight-crotched conservatives! The trans groomers are taking advantage of woke uncritical thinking and sowing the cognitive confusion noted by my commenter (who I've asked to turn it into a guest post for my GSL).
Two of the greatest psychological weaknesses in the female brain are the desire to be 'nice' and to be liked. This is why you find so many women on the liberal end of the spectrum, and where the lowest numbers for mental health lie, especially with young liberal, progressive women.
And, reliable as sunrise, pedophilia is being promoted as just another "gender identity."
Only they call it "minor attracted."
Every limitation is oppression, right? We won't talk about ripped vaginas, ripped rectums, or broken minds, because inhibiting people from "being who they really are" is an intolerable injustice.
And the doctors who sew them back together can meet every morning in the conference room over coffee and 𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑒 at each other for the benefit they do promoting 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦.
'Nice' women also pretty much never threaten each other with our genitals. You never hear us get mad and yell, "Well you can just eat my p**sy!" Whenever a man says, "Suck my lady dick!" it's a noob move by an amateur 😁
I *get* why men outside the transnuts support this; on some level, many men want to 'help out a bro' in supporting a sexual fetish he himself probably doesn't share; because who knows what those feminazis will come after next??? What if they go after porn and prostitution? Droning on about sex trafficking, which NEVER happens? What I don't understand is why *women* go along with this, although someone in my comments section this weekend came up with a damned good theory: That this is another way for bad actors to prey upon women (and I would add, children) sexually. They create the woke cognitive confusion that what they do isn't sex ("gender dysphoria"), that the less woke groomed a woman is, the less cognitive confusion she has, and the more instantaneous the recognition of unwanted sex is, and that they groom adults to accept the fictional trans children is non-sexual in nature when it is frankly so.
I wrote an article a few months ago arguing that 'trans grooming' also includes the grooming of adults to accept, eventually, pedophilia, I talked about 'MAPs', and said I didn't think the woke would offer any barriers when the pedos came to them and said, "If your child is old enough to know what they are [gender-wise], they're old enough to know who they want to have sex with and your child says they want to have sex with me. Children know what's best for them, as you're fond of saying. Butt out!"
I really do believe this is where it's going, because the woke have been grooming themselves with its 'inclusivity' obsession and desire to be sexually open - you know, not like those sourpussed tight-crotched conservatives! The trans groomers are taking advantage of woke uncritical thinking and sowing the cognitive confusion noted by my commenter (who I've asked to turn it into a guest post for my GSL).
Two of the greatest psychological weaknesses in the female brain are the desire to be 'nice' and to be liked. This is why you find so many women on the liberal end of the spectrum, and where the lowest numbers for mental health lie, especially with young liberal, progressive women.
And, reliable as sunrise, pedophilia is being promoted as just another "gender identity."
Only they call it "minor attracted."
Every limitation is oppression, right? We won't talk about ripped vaginas, ripped rectums, or broken minds, because inhibiting people from "being who they really are" is an intolerable injustice.
And the doctors who sew them back together can meet every morning in the conference room over coffee and 𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑒 at each other for the benefit they do promoting 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑦.
'Nice' women also pretty much never threaten each other with our genitals. You never hear us get mad and yell, "Well you can just eat my p**sy!" Whenever a man says, "Suck my lady dick!" it's a noob move by an amateur 😁