"If you are referencing the UN definition of Human Rights. Both the United States and Israel are recognized states by the UN. From the UN perspective, they have a "right" to exist."
States are not people. And the legal and political concepts that apply to states and people are different in many ways. Therefore recognising the existence of…
"If you are referencing the UN definition of Human Rights. Both the United States and Israel are recognized states by the UN. From the UN perspective, they have a "right" to exist."
States are not people. And the legal and political concepts that apply to states and people are different in many ways. Therefore recognising the existence of a state without arguing it has a special right to exist, is not a contradiction.
If you want to talk about some anarchist future where rights and governments and the UN no longer exist, and everybody just does whatever they want because that's your conception of the human condition, that's fine. But it's not the world we live in today. So I'm not talking about that.
You are ignoring the basis of the human condition for idealistic morals.
Might makes right and always will. Human history proves it. That’s why the US and for that matter Israel invest heavily in the military. Western Europe ONLY exists today because they have the US as part of NATO. The have under invested in their military because of their idealistic perspectives that humans will rise to a greater moral perspective, They are realizing now that the Muslim world and Russia for that matter don’t agree with western morality.
Thats the reality of the situation. Anything else is pretending humans can get along!
"If you are referencing the UN definition of Human Rights. Both the United States and Israel are recognized states by the UN. From the UN perspective, they have a "right" to exist."
States are not people. And the legal and political concepts that apply to states and people are different in many ways. Therefore recognising the existence of a state without arguing it has a special right to exist, is not a contradiction.
If you want to talk about some anarchist future where rights and governments and the UN no longer exist, and everybody just does whatever they want because that's your conception of the human condition, that's fine. But it's not the world we live in today. So I'm not talking about that.
Very defensive response.
You are ignoring the basis of the human condition for idealistic morals.
Might makes right and always will. Human history proves it. That’s why the US and for that matter Israel invest heavily in the military. Western Europe ONLY exists today because they have the US as part of NATO. The have under invested in their military because of their idealistic perspectives that humans will rise to a greater moral perspective, They are realizing now that the Muslim world and Russia for that matter don’t agree with western morality.
Thats the reality of the situation. Anything else is pretending humans can get along!